This article is interesting in that it gives a flavour of what it is like to be born and grow up in a country and yet not be a full citizen of it. The article looks at a Bengali Paara (locality) in Karachi and the biharis in Bangladesh. But in terms of the forthcoming Bangladeshi elections, these figures are worth noting:
Official figures note that 15,000 refugees (sic, but referring to biharis) out of approximately 300,000 have applied for enrolment in the voting system to date. According to data collected from various sources, some 6,000 people spread across 70 different camps in Bangladesh preferred to register themselves. The number includes 360 inhabitants of Mohammadpur Geneva Camp, Dhaka. However, only 180 were able to provide all the information and photographs necessary for the registration process.
So firstly there is a discrepancy between the government figure (15,000 registered) and figures from other sources (6,000 registered) it seems. The same article hints at some of the apprehensions of the Bihari community which might be responsible for this. Many apparently felt that taking up citizenship would entail letting go of their current status ( The article incorrectly notes this status as “refugee status.” The biharis do not have refugee status in Bangladesh as far as the UNHCR is concerned. Their current status has some very meagre and rapidly vanishing benefits in terms of camp access to services etc). And it was this fear of losing out on these scraps of assistance that possibly explains the low numbers.
The article notes:
Their fears crystallised after several families in camps in Khalispur, Kulna were issued with legal notices ordering them to evacuate the camps, as they were no longer officially refugees.
The figures in the article are a bit surprising and I wonder why a newspaper would publish without references or anything. My own sources - Hasan Mohammad of AYGUSC tells me
- About 15,000 camp inmates living in Mohammadpur and Mirpur of Dhaka enlisted their names in this process. But the actual number of voters may be more.
- Out of the above number about 2,600 Geneva camp inmates enlisted their names and got NIC (official report)
- 80% of the total eligible voters will be enlisted in the voters list and NIC of 116 camps
- There are 116 settlements all over the country according to survey conducted by Al-Falah and UNHCR not 70 camps.
6 Responses for "Very low voter registration amongst Biharis for Bangladesh elections?"
[…] Very low voter registration amongst Biharis for Bangladesh elections? -Shafiur […]
hi shafiur/guys,
low voter registration you apparently based on 02 places i.e.in pockets of geneva camp,dhaka & khalishpur,khulna. out of the entire dhaka & khulna region &/or 116 settlements, all over bangladesh.
let me assure your goodself the rate of registration in chittagong is around 70%-80%. notable isolated incident wherein an spgrc leader suhell khan given orders that, “inmates must not do what he does but must do what he says!!!”. ac’dgly he & his entire family registered as voter & had registrations of others cancelled by managing a ward com. iqbal a courageous inmate of the said halishahr camp managed the same commissioner paid back suhell khan in the same coin but didn’t cancel s.khan gang’s registration.
the moral of the story is that, like geneva & khalishpur camps, 1/2 swallows don’t make summer!!!
hv a nice day!!!
Thanks for the update.
SPGRC is the Stranded Pakistani General Repatriation Committee. I think it would be fair to say that this group have little faith in a solution that makes Bangladesh the focus. And hence presumably the actions of above Suhell Khan.
hi,
tnx for the feedback,
sljamal
Sal Jamal
Your very correct comment about NOT using the term “bihari” somehow got deleted in my haste to approve your comment. I am sorry about that. Feel free to post it again if you wish.
In the meantime, I agree with you that the name that should be used is “urdu speaking.” If you look at the documentary I co-produced and researched, we try to explain the term. http://www.swapnabhumi.com
I used it above in a journalistic way because sadly that name arouses more interest than the longer name. But you are of course absolutely right - the term has negative connotations and should be used with care.
hi sr,
sir: very well said & also do accept my tnx and gratitudes for the dox “swapnabhumi” i hv seen it in the lions c.centre, khulshi a few months back in chittagong.
coming back to weaning towards the description “urdubashis” this is sort of a visionary concept which can robustly march a long way towards the goals of the hindu/buddho/christian fronts, their trust funds etc., you know what i mean??? come to think of it you as the author of swapnabhumi can take this; callous, miserably exploited lot to the logical achievement of said goals.
my dearest daughter, putool continuously keeps pestering me for single minded pursuit of her above goal. how i wish i could call on you physically in pursuit of this sacred goal, in dhaka???. (but “urdubashi” definitely NOT urdu speaking!!!) also i wonder whether we can write urdubashi ethnic community??? whats your valued opinion???
my cell 01713 109070 after 7:oo p:m till 12 midnight now putool holds the same, at this point in time! pls reciprocate???
take care, hv a nice day
Leave a reply