As I am applying for a part time job, so my contact information are- 01671761051 and mail address-rizviadipa@yahoo.com

I am Rizvia Hossain, from Bangladesh, searching for a part time job because i am a student, and i know that KFC is an international brand that can give me this opportunity.
So it would be my pleasure if your company can give me this opportunity after assessing my qualification and experience. My resume and references will be available upon request.

Sincerely yours,
Rizvia Hossain

Listen, what matters here is whether the transfer of money was illegal or not. If you want to smear Muhammed Yunus you need to provide more convincing argumentation than David Bergman, who lays out evidence that a transfer of money never even took place (http://unheardvoice.net/blog/2010/12/30/validity-of-charges-against-grameen-under-question/).

Sure, the government may have the right to depose Yunus, but the only reason they do it now (instead of ten years ago, when he passed retirement age) is because of the unfavourable winds blowing against him – winds they themselves have underblown. However, a more clumsy, petty and unnecessary thrashing of a competitor (which is the only possible reason why Hasina seems to hate him so much – even though he shouldn’t be seen as that much of a threat to her), is difficult to find on the world stage today.

Instead of unearthing dark truths about Yunus and Grameen Bank, this episode have broadcasted the rotten workings of the Prime Minister and the country’s politics to the world. I’m sorry for the country, but maybe it’s about time. Hasina’s made a fool of Bangladesh, but from now on she can’t fool anybody anymore.

In retaliation for his anti-corruption support, the Hasina regime have shamed Bangladesh with a (laughable) propaganda campaign against Dr Yunus. The above article for example, wrongly alleges Yunus’s “Grameen Bank” for above list of complains, when in actual fact the enterprise is a LEGAL Bangladeshi Group of Companies, (just like Beximco, Pran or Delta), and namely Grameen Corporation.

Unlike Beximco of course, the beneficiaries of Grameen are not the individual founder owners, the beneficiaries of Grameen Corporation happen to be MILLIONS of poverty-stricken landless, homeless, sharehiolders of Grameen.

The Hasina camp attacks Yunus for being Chairman at the age of 70, yet the Chairman of an exactly similar BRAC coporation is 75 years old. BRAC has the same structure, same interest rates, banking, shareholder and business policies as Grameen, yet the govt has SINGLED-OUT only Dr Yunus, and only Grameen.

When every major Corp in BD is allowed to run shady businesses amassing billions of government sponsored funds into personal Swiss accounts, the govt abuses its power by oppressing our own shining successes of international acclaim.

Instead of arranging national programs to upgrade the poor, our corrupt politicians retaliate against private individuals who sacrifice their lives to eradicate poverty.

——–
http://ns.bdnews24.com/details.php?id=37470&cid=4
http://www.brac.net/content/what-we-do-socially-responsible-investments

And folks notice the vehemence of the words of Nazia Manzur. And in come ….no i shan’t stoop to such debate.

But on the OWN institution thing…let us remind Nazia of the finer details. Nazia, please note the words “government” and “state” below:

Grameen Bank and the Government:
Grameen Bank is a statutory public authority created by the Grameen
Bank Ordinance, 1983. (Ordinance No. XLVI of 1983)

Under Article 152 of the Bangladesh Constitution the term “Statutory public authority” means any authority, corporation or body the activities or the principal activities of which are authorised by any Act, Ordinance, Order or instrument having the force of law in Bangladesh.”

As a public statutory authority, Grameen Bank is an organ/instrument of the State, the term “the State” being defined in Article 152 of the Constitution as including “Parliament, the government and statutory public authorities”.
.
The status of Grameen Bank as a statutory public authority, i.e. an instrument/organ of state is further defined by the authority vested in the Government read together with the functions required to be carried out by the Government and Bangladesh Bank (which is also a statutory public authority) in the various provisions of the Grameen Bank Ordinance, 1983 (as amended up to 1990, the 1990 amendment being the last statutory amendment made in respect of Grameen Bank)
This authority and the functions extend from the creation of Grameen Bank to its winding up.
Grameen Bank is not an independent entity which operates outside the purview of Governmental process as a State organ.
Grameen Bank’s legal status is distinct from an association of persons such as a company, trust or cooperative which associations may be formed under a law but not by the law itself and which associations of persons are not statutory public authorities and therefore not State organs/instruments of State.
Contrary to a view incorrectly held by many, as a State organ / instrument, Grameen Bank has not been founded by any individual person, or group of persons. Its existence, continued operations and dissolution (winding up) are dependent on the State acting through the Government although Parliament may invoke its legislative authority to repeal the statute (Ordinance) under which it was created.

Under the statute, the Government retains the authority to determine the rural areas to which the operations of Grameen Bank shall extend. This determination by the Government would require notification in the official gazette.
The Government retains the authority to determine the initial paid-up share capital of the Bank which presently stands at Tk. 7 Crore 20 Lakhs of The present paid up capital was increased in 31 July,1990 by an amendment to the Statute involving a notification in the official gazette and the official publications of the statute show that the present paid up capital is Tk 7 crore 20 lakhs. The term “initial period” would mean such period from the date of the commencement of the GB Ordinance as the Government may by notification in the official gazette determine. It is apparent that the term “initial period” which features in Section 2 (g) vests the only Government with authority to determine by notification in the official gazette what the paid-up share capital shall be.
The Government retains the authority to direct what specific provisions of the Banking Companies Act, 1994 shall be applicable to Grameen Bank. The Government shall exercise this authority by notification in the official gazette. It is evident under this provision that the Government retains the authority to invoke or revoke provisions of the Banking Companies Act, 1991 at any time.
An increase in the authorized capital of the Bank requires the prior approval of the Government which means that the authority to increase the authorized capital is vested in the Government. Given that the authorized capital of Grameen Bank is stated in the statute (i.e. the GB Ordinance) to be Tk. 10 Crore, any approval by the Government shall have to be reflected/ embodied in the statute itself and not by any approval by the Government which is not incorporated in the statute. An approval by the Government without a change in the statute would mean that the Government approval has not been acted upon and may not be deemed as a valid statutory provision. The authorised capital of Grameen Bank under the statute stands at Tk 10 Crore.

Under the GB Ordinance it is provided that the Government shall hold 25% of the shares of Grameen Bank. It is also provided that it is only the Government which may increase the paid-up share capital of the Bank from time to time. Thus the Government retains the authority to determine the paid-up share capital. Further, unless differently embodied in the statute, the Government shall continue to hold 25% of the paid-up share capital of Grameen Bank. As the statute presently stands, having last been amended in 1990, the Government holds 25% of the paid-up shares.
The Government is vested with and retains the authority to appoint a Chairman of the Board of Directors. Such appointment of the Chairman would also be limited to Directors appointed by the Government itself. Even in the event of the vacancy in the office of the Chairman, the Government would have the authority to appoint any other Director to discharge the functions of the Chairman except that such Chairman shall not be the Managing Director. The Government’s authority to continue to appoint a Chairman and two other Directors is co-extensive with the Statute as it stands today.
Of the 12 Directors comprising the Board the Government shall have the authority to appoint 3 Directors.
The 3 appointed Directors shall hold office at the pleasure of the Government. This provision would mean that only the Government may remove the 3 or any of the Directors appointed by the Government.
The Government is vested with and retains the authority to receive the resignation of its appointed Chairman or its appointed Directors.
Since the Managing Director or any other Director may resign his office by writing under his hand to the Chairman who is a Government appointee, it is to the Government appointed Chairman (and not to the Board) that the resignation of a Director may be submitted. Such provision makes clear that the Government alone or through its appointed Chairman that the Government may receive and accept the resignation of a Director.
The Bank which may issue and sell bonds requires the prior approval of the Government to do so. The Government’s authority to approve the issue and sale of bonds and debentures at interest rates approved by the Government affirms the Republic’s control over such issue and sale of bonds and debentures.
The authority of the Government is further iterated by the provision that the bonds and debentures shall be guaranteed by the Government (i.e. the invocation of a sovereign guarantee) which in turn creates a loan by the Government furnished on behalf of the Bank to a Third Party or Parties.
The Government is vested with and retains the authority to receive returns, reports and statements from the Bank which the Bank would be required to furnish as the Government would require from time to time.
The Government is vested with and retains the authority to receive within three
months after the end of every financial year statement of accounts audited by the auditors thereby affirming the Government’s regulatory financial authority over Grameen Bank’s financial operations provided in the Statute itself.
The Government is vested with and retains its authority to levy taxes on Grameen Bank.
Any exemption from taxes payable by Grameen Bank will be determined by the Government for the period such exemption shall be made. It is a requirement that such exemption shall be notified in the official gazette.
The Government and only the Government has the authority to wind up Grameen Bank. The authority to issue an Order to wind up Grameen Bank also vests in the Government. The manner in which such winding up may be effectuated also vests in the Government.
The Government retains the authority to make rules for holding elections of Directors.
The Government retains the authority to remove any difficulty in relation to the transference of the Grameen Bank project carried out under the aegis of Bangladesh Bank to the statutory public authority which Grameen bank became with the establishment of Grameen bank by the Ordinance.